You are viewing dr_von_fangirl

Welcome! Looking for scans?

POSTS CONTAINING SCANS ARE NOW OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

Originally, to minimize abuse, all scans posts were friends only, but as a show of good faith, my policy is now open-to-everybody scans.

ALL SCANS POSTS ARE PROTECTED BY THE FAIR USE ACT

Blog posts featuring scans of comic books are limited to less than half of each comic book and are only done to supplement the actual reviews of the issues. They are used for EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, not for profit.

In many--in fact, MOST--cases, the comics I'm scanning are not in print or collected in Trade Paperback format. The only way to find them is to scour back issue bins or ebay. This blog is meant to simply serve as an encyclopedia of Catwoman's comics appearances and as a tribute to the character herself.

Catwoman Wallpapers from Infinite Crisis

It's been a long time, hasn't it? But, something hit my inbox last night that demanded a return to the blog--however brief--to share. DC's Infinite Crisis is a game that plays with continuity in very interesting ways and includes different versions of the characters in the DCU. Among them is, of course, Catwoman. As bonus material, the site has made desktop/mobile wallpapers available for download. They're all gorgeous, and I encourage you to check them (and the game, if you are so inclined!) out. Here are the Selina-based images!

1920x1080_Prime-Catwoman-Classic


1920x1080_Prime-Catwoman

More behind the cutCollapse )

I'm baaaack.

So. Basically life imploded over the past few months in ways that I was not expecting, resulting in an extended vacation from the internets, comics and all fun stuff in general. It's been pretty rough over here. :/

I'm preparing to dust this place off and start posting again, so consider this your heads up. Yay.

When I started collecting Catwoman comics, I made myself a complete post-crisis appearance list (the raw results of which you can find here) and slowly started padding out my collection, bit by bit. I didn't do this for pre-crisis, because...well, Catwoman has comparatively few appearances before that point and I know what all of them are. I amassed my list and turned it into a database, sortable by creative team, issue number, storyarc, and type of appearance and then started filling it in.

As I crossed comics off my list one by one, I came across one that I just could not find anywhere: Elseworlds 80 Page Giant. After some digging (read: turning to ask the SO and now you know why I keep him around!) I found out why: the book was finished, but never published due to a short story that stirred up a little controversy.

I figured that, since DC shelved the book, I would NEVER get my grubby little paws on it, so there was really no sense in worrying about it.

But, as is often the case with comics, I got a pleasant surprise. DC has released the lost book after more than twelve years of it sitting on the shelf, as DC Comics Presents Elseworlds 100-Page Spectacular!



If this book were a little older, I would scan Catwoman's appearance and share it here, but since it's a new book and is currently on store shelves, I encourage you to go pick it up for yourselves to help support it.

The 100 Page Spectaculars are one of my favorite things to come out of DC in the past year or so. Collecting stories that are hard to get your hands on in glossy hundred page volumes is pretty smart. I'd be buying up more of them if not for the $7.99 cover price (I mean seriously, you guys? I can get a hundred page bronze age comic for WAY less than that at my LCS!) but they're a brilliant idea, regardless. I'm hoping they reprint several of the old prestige format books and pair them up--like Two-Face: Crime and Punishment with its companion Riddler: The Riddle Factory, for example, or with Eye of the Beholder, another great Two-Face comic--so that a whole new generation will have the opportunity to read them.

Like I said: hop on over to your local comics shop and buy it, baby. With seven fun short stories and a bunch of even more fun mock-up Elseworlds covers, it's worth it.

Watch This Space.

Am I back? I think I might be back. Some sudden serious IRL stuff, health issues and having a new-ish baby (does he still count as new? He's six months old. If he were a car, he'd have lost at least half his bluebook value by now) have pretty much kept me on the fringes of the internet for the past few months, but I'm slowly working my way back into fandom-y business. I think. I hope. Probably not. Everything will probably blow up in my face just as I think I'm able to get back to comics blogging, because that's the way my life works, but I might as well toss my hat in the ring anyhow. Woohoo! Ill advised hat tossing! Awesome.

I've got some posts lined up, including some more Catwoman (1993) scans and reviews, and...ah, hell with it, I'll just list some of what I've got planned:

1. Batman Returns analysis and review, including novelization and comic adaptation comparisons

2. Catwoman (1993) #6-15 scans and reviews (I actually have scans prepared up to #50, but writing that down just sounds like madness)

3. Think Like Selina posts, Whipcracking: The Fine Art of Not Hitting Yourself in the Face, High Society: Navigating it Like a Pro, Casing the Joint: The Art of the Museum Heist, Safecracking for Dummies, Handcuffs and How to Escape Them and a few others that are top secret hush-hush.

4. Copycats posts about Black Cat (Marvel), Black Cat (Harvey Comics), Bad Kitty (Chaos!) and Discordia, my own ancient ill-begotten almost-picked-up-for-publication-by-a-small-press comic

5. Batman: The Animated Series bits and bobbles, including character profiles, series bible info and episode synopses from unproduced eps.

6. A bunch of gorgeous custom Catwoman action figures.

7. Gotham Guest Stars: a series of posts spotlighting the other Gotham Rogues, because a girl can't be all Catwoman all the time, it turns out. Who knew? Not me, that's for sure.

8. And I'm also considering cutting and f-locking the last post here because I'm kind of sick of looking at it. I still stand by it, but damn I'm tired of seeing it. Bleeeh.

So that's what's currently in the pipeline for at least the next few months. I probably won't get to do even half of what I want to, and what I do wind up doing won't be for another week or two at least, but I'm still going to try.

Until next time, I remain the somewhat haggered but always foolishly optimistic,

--Dr. Von Fangirl

ETA: And I totally spaced and forgot to say that there are some Wizard exclusive goodies on the way, as well as a post about the Bad Girl comics trend of the nineties. Also, possibly porn, but I'm having a hard time making my thoughts come together on that one. We'll see how that goes.

So I recently wrote about High Fashion's Crush on Catwoman, and the trend continues with a new line of high end designer shoes from French fashion designer Andre. He's also designed a line of shoes based around Wonder Woman's iconic costume, which are included in this post because some of these need to be seen to be believed. They're only available in Europe, and you can't actually buy them online (I smell secondary market price hikes on the way soon) but if you're in Europe, well, have fun buying up all the designer shoes!



Lots more goodies behind the cut.Collapse )

Okay, look, I'm going to go on record right now and say: Ew. Ballet flats. Other than the ridiculously impractical and pointless kitten heel, there isn't a shoe I loathe with deeper passion. I won't go into details, because that'd be exceedingly boring, but God, I hate ballet flats so, so much.

Also, I'm not sure why Wonder Woman's costume has been translated into what appear to be nineteen forties orthopedic bowling shoes. I mean, I can kinda follow the pattern of logic, given Diana Prince being an army nurse during WWII originally but still, in a modern fashion context...what? Is anyone actually going to buy those?

Anyway. In case you weren't aware already, this isn't the first time that DC has teamed up with a super high scale designer to help celebrate their characters. As I recall, they teamed with a bunch of French designers about a year ago and brought such gems as this pair of thigh high Catwoman inspired boots to the scene:



Additionally, there's the nOir DC Comics jewelry line, which I was working on a post about sometime last month but totally forgot to complete because I am lazy and awful but here, have a Catwoman Claw necklace to make up for it:



...and I also didn't talk about designer Jeremy Scott's Superhero inspired line from fashion week this past spring.

So pretty much what I'm saying is I have a Superhero themed fashion post in my future whether I want it to be there or not. OH WELL, I GUESS I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO WINDOW SHOP FOR COMIC BOOK RELATED FASHION FOR THE GREATER GOOD the greater good, RIGHT GUYS? RIGHT. I WILL JUST GO AND DO THAT NOW.

New Catwoman Origin! Kinda sorta.

Hi! *cough, choke, strangle, die*

...okay, maybe I'm not that sick, but I am sadly still recovering, and will be for the next five-ish weeks or so, if my doctor is to be believed. Stupid viruses trying to make my spleen explode and ruin my liver. Bleh. Bleh, I say!

Anyway, it's been awhile, but among about a million other things I still have lying around waiting to work on posts for, like the Year One review, the Catwoman #2 review, a new Copycats post and another Think Like Selina, there's a new two page Catwoman 'origin' comic created exclusively for Journeys to help celebrate their DC Comics themed Converse line that I am obligated to post.

The origin glosses over the vast majority of Selina's history, of course, but then you can't really expect a two page comic to do as thorough a job as the complete definitive origin of Catwoman that took nine months and more caffeine than I care to think about to bring into being. Still, it's cute.

Even if much of it does fly directly in the face of the current DC canon that we're supposed to all be taking totally seriously despite the complete lack of editorial continuity rassafrassafricken-make-up-your-bloody-minds-already *grumble, mutter, grumble, grumble, fistshake*

Without further ado:



You can read the rest of the comic behind the cut...Collapse )

If you want, you can download the PDF for yourself, which includes numerous other DC character origins at this link, and I'll save my ranting about how so much pre-Crisis is apparently canon now even though it doesn't really work at all aaaargh for a more opportune time.

In the meantime, I'm going to go take a nap, and then maybe try and get up later to put the finishing touches on my next post: Whip Cracking: The Fine Art of Not Hitting Yourself in the Face. Or maybe I'll sleep some more. Being sick sucks.

Until then, I remain your humble, sickly servant, Dr. Von Fangirl. You know the drill: same cat time, same cat zzzzZzzzzzZzzzz....

Can I just be done with being sick already, please? Ungh.

Anywhoodle doodle.

My brain is somewhat understandably fried from the now fourteen day long fever (BLEH!), so I hope you'll forgive any fever-induced nonsense that sneaks into this post purple monkey banana raffle.

Last week, the fourteen minute long Catwoman short hit the internet, but I didn't want to bring it here until I was sure that everyone could watch and discuss it. I also waited until there was a super high quality video available, because who wants to watch crappy, choppy quality footage, right?

So, I encourage you to watch the following, and then we can discuss.



To the woodshed!Collapse )

All in all, I don't consider this short much to write home about. It's four minutes of stripping and like, eight minutes of car chases, which leaves about a minute and a half for character development. What little we get at the end is heartwarming, but though it makes the whole short, it feels like this could have been half as long, more tightly paced and been twice as affecting. I do so hate to see potential wasted like this.

Please, discuss!




As always! Please remember that this is a safe space for everyone and thus, I firmly enforce my rules about hurtful language in the comments. If you ever want me to protect you if someone calls you names here, you've got to help me protect others! If you want to discuss sex workers, call them sex workers--not 'prostitutes', 'whores', 'hookers' or anything similar; and don't use words that are slurs towards women: 'bitch', 'slut', etc. (Modified versions such as "bitching" and "slutty" and so forth are obviously extensions of this rule. I know you're more creative with your vocabularies than that! ^_^)

The little old lady rule is in effect: If you wouldn't use it in front of your significant other's adorable little grandmother the first time you meet her, please don't use it here.

Catwoman #2 (2011): the debacle continues

Not too long ago, Comic Book Resources posted an exclusive five page preview of Catwoman #2. As you can see, it seems to pick up in the middle of a scene, which is kind of...odd for a comic book preview. I actually really liked the preview, especially Alfred's involvement, and was totally okay with Selina-in-Disguise (especially since her belt is obviously her whip. Super cute!)

But it was still really weird. Usually, websites that get exclusives post the first five pages of the comic book in question. Why, I wondered, did they start the preview in the middle of the story?

Well, the answer is easy.

The first three pages of Catwoman #2 are....can you guess? WAIT FOR IT...

...

...

SEX

*FACEDESK*

I haven't even gotten any further in my reading. I glanced at the first couple of pages and I had to come straight here to report. The preview actually had me hopeful, and then...

Three 'sexy' pages behind the cut. Like most things involving Catwoman lately, TOTALLY NOT SAFE FOR WORK.Collapse )

I'll be back with a more in depth critique and exploration of the events of the issue later, but to say I'm disappointed is something of the understatement of the year.

ETA: Aaand I read ahead. TO SAY I AM PISSED OFF IS AN EVEN BIGGER UNDERSTATEMENT THAN MY LAST UNDERSTATEMENT. GOD DAMN IT, DC COMICS, Y U DO DIS?

More thoughts later. Have to go to the doctor right now. Bleh.

Though I can't find out much about it, Dolman Magazine (Spain) seems to be a comics publication much like the recently-defunct Wizard Magazine, or the long-ago-defunct Hero Illustrated, and Guillem March has done a fair bit of work for them as a cover artist. About a week ago, the following gorgeous piece came to my attention:



Since first seeing this, it has rapidly climbed the ranks among my favorite pieces of Catwoman art and clawed its way up towards the top of the heap. Not only is the Batman Returns version of Catwoman one of my very favorite designs/interpretations of the character, the image is dripping with delightful symbolism and uses light and shadow on the wet-look vinyl suit in an unexpected way. I do so seriously dig it, don't you?

A stack of Catwoman (2011) solicits!

Unngh. Still really, really sick. Getting better, but man oh man, it's going to be awhile before I recover enough to do much that's substantial. My Year One review is gathering cobwebs over here. :( I also still don't have the energy to respond to comments, so I hope you'll forgive the delay again; I will talk to you guys, it just has to wait until I'm done hacking my lungs up.

(Gimme a T! M! I!)

Anyway! I haven't really bothered to post solicits months and months in advance, as I much prefer to get discussion going about what's going to happen like, next week, but something interesting has happened with the solicit for Catwoman #3 (it's been significantly altered), and I want to talk about that later and how it reflects a disturbing pattern I'm noticing in comics covers lately, so I figure we'd better get all caught up.

Without further ado, here are the solicits for issues #2-5, including a comparison between the old and new covers of Catwoman #3.

Issue #2:



She’s a thief who lives to steal just for the thrill of breaking the law. He’s The Dark Knight, obsessively driven to battle evil with every ounce of his strength. They should keep each other at arm’s length, but…they just can’t seem to help themselves!

Don’t miss this issue – things are gonna get messy!


Sooo...Selina has no motivation to steal other than 'breaking the law is a thrill'? My, what depth of character. Also, messy? Did the condom break?

Issue #3 (First Cover):



Issue #3 (New Cover):



Cats hate baths. Cats hate dogs. And cats hate being caught. Catwoman stole from the wrong man, and now he’s got her. He wants his stuff back, he wants answers and he wants blood.

Cats had better have nine lives, because Selina Kyle is about to lose one!


Oh, this is fun! Just like an activity book! How many cat puns/cliches can YOU count?

Issue #4:



Catwoman pays a call on Wayne Manor, but those who live there prefer that you call first. Then Selina Kyle says goodbye to an old friend, says hello to an older one, and resolves more firmly than ever to strike out on her own. Only one of those things almost gets her killed.

But...but...you guys, isn't one of Catwoman's defining characteristics her independence? Isn't that kind of the whole supposed point of the new series? I mean...

Issue #5



Catwoman is flying solo and finding plenty of turbulence! She has her paws full when a simple smash and grab turns into a hit and pummeled, as she faces an adversary who is more than a match for Selina. She calls herself Reach, and she doesn’t pull any punches. Can our favorite Feline Fatale land on her feet?

Oh, I see. She needed to go solo so we could make plane puns! HA! And more cat puns! Puns, puns, puns! Because in your self appointed new grim and gritty universe, you should evoke the 60's Batman series in your solicitations!

(Please note: If the series actually DID that in a self aware camp way, I would be so thrilled...)

Also, how do shoulders work? Not quite like that, I assure you.

Sigh.

All snarking aside, I find that each of these covers is much better than that of the debut issue, even taking into account that anatomy doesn't really work the way #2 and #5 would have us believe. The fact that the cover for #3 was significantly altered, to turn Catwoman from snarling to significantly more passive, reflects a larger trend in comics covers that prominently feature female characters, but that's a topic for when I feel less like death in a crockpot.

Which issue are you most looking forward to based on its description, or which cover do you personally like the best?

Two more Catwoman skins in Arkham City!

Hiiii.

So...yeah, I've been fighting a horrible fever for the past week, in between updates, so I apologize for not answering any comments. I've mainly been concerned with actually getting content up on the blog as it catches my attention. I promise I'll answer everybody, just...not for a couple of days. I'm still really, really sick. I'm at that point of exhausted-from-being-sick where typing anything more than the bare minimum is kind of a huge chore.

The Batman: Year One review is coming along, but for such a short movie, it sure was a lot to chew on--especially considering I'm doing a dual review with about_faces, my counterpart for all things Two-Face. I really wanted to get the review done before the DVD actually hits shelves, since that's what I should do, because I got an advance copy and should therefore totally scoop everybody else, but eh, the flu, what can you do?

So, Catwoman news:

Arkham City, like many video games of its kind, has numerous alternate skins for the playable characters. Batman has several, Robin has several, and Catwoman has three--that we know of thus far. There's the standard zip-up suit with the goggles, and then...



On the left, we have the purple suit as drawn by Tim Sale in The Long Halloween, Dark Victory and Catwoman: When in Rome, and on the right, we have the gray suit from Batman: The Animated Series.

(I've seen the purple costume mistakenly referred to as the 'Year One' costume and it just makes my eyes cross, I tell you. It was gray, people, gray!)

I really, really look forward to playing with TAS Catwoman, and finding out whether or not there are any other skins available to unlock. Additionally, I really looking forward to seeing whether or not these pictures do each version of the character justice.

Also, is it just me, or do each of their physiques look fairly different? I mean, considering how--let's say--'well endowed' the zip-up suit Catwoman is in every piece of game footage we see, these two skins look tame and tiny in comparison. I'd be impressed if the Tim Sale version followed his style of musculature (as I think it does, given the way her collar bone looks), and if the TAS version was in keeping with the sleek curves of the animated series. That's way cooler than, say, an unlockable schoolgirl outfit, BloodRayne2Iamlookingatyouverysternly.

While, as far as I know, none of the villains will be playable, it'll be interesting to see if any of them get different costume options at any point in the game. If not, I'll still keep my eyes peeled for rejected concept art, because that's one of my favorite things omg.

Quick question, guys: given the opportunity to play as any Batman universe character, which of their costumes would you prefer to have access to? Would you play as question mark jacket Riddler? Unscarred Harvey Dent? Killing Joke Joker?

As I reported just a couple of weeks ago, GameStop is putting out a limited edition strategy guide for Batman: Arkham City, with two variant covers: one of Batman, one of Catwoman.

Those hit the internet yesterday, but I was so caught up in other Catwoman news, I didn't get to post about them.



Ah. I see Catwoman still has an ass. I'm so glad to be reminded, as I'd forgotten since the last twelve times Arkham City forcibly reminded me.

(Although, to be fair to Arkham City, it's not as bad as the comic book series I'm currently slogging through, Glory by Catwoman alum Jo Duffy and 90's superstar artist Mike Deodato--wherein, despite its excellent writing, I am reminded that the heroine has a costume with a thong every three panels. I GET IT. SHE HAS AN ASS. I HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN IN THE LAST TEN SECONDS. I PROMISE I BELIEVE YOU. CAN I GO BACK TO READING THE REALLY GOOD STORY NOW?)

Additionally, I have new screenshots of super clarity to share!



About a dozen more behind the cut, including images featuring Harley Quinn and Hugo Strange...Collapse )

And now for the bad news...

If you're planning on waiting to buy a cheaper second-hand copy of the game online or at your local games retailer, Warner Bros. has news for you: all of Catwoman's missions in Batman: Arkham City--which apparently make up about ten percent of the gameplay, are locked unless you have the 'First Purchaser' code, which is only included with a new copy of the game. If you buy Arkham City second hand, you'll have to pay for a pass key of your very own, or else just not play those missions.

As far as I know, this under-lock-and-key ten percent is supposed to be standard, not the downloadable content that I recently reported was theorized to be available. This sucks, especially if you're someone who's got just enough disposable cash to afford a used copy, but not the pass key.

Warner Bros. received a lot of praise for making Catwoman a playable character in Arkham City, and rightfully so, since blockbuster games with plot like this are pretty rarely have a playable female character, but putting her under lock and key is a really disappointing move.

Will that stop me from playing it? Well, no, but only because I have gamer friends who are planning on buying it and letting me take notes while they play through it.

More Arkham City content to follow in the coming weeks, you betcha.

Anyone who's familiar with the Batman: Year One graphic novel, or the Complete Definitive Origin of Catwoman will recognize these scenes. These images are exclusive to dr_von_fangirl; you won't find them anywhere else. I know watermarks are fucking annoying, and I personally can't stand them, but I'm getting pretty tired of my content being ripped off.









The animation is really pretty in the actual film, somewhat reminiscent of Red Garden or Witch Hunter Robin (two animes I quite enjoy), so it's got that goin' for it.

So the whole family sat down to watch Batman: Year One last night.

Sigh.

My in-depth review is upcoming; it's taking much longer than I anticipated. But if you're fond of Year One on the whole as a comic book, or you're fond of Year One as a Catwoman fan...it might not be worth your while.

So far, my biggest beef is that the vast majority of Selina's lines, including the most iconic, were cut. Those that weren't cut were heavily altered.

(Her line, "Christ, not even light out. Christ, five in the morning." was completely cut, which would be understandable from a censorship perspective if they hadn't added a cop saying "God damn it" in another scene--a line that wasn't even in the comics. I guess men can blaspheme, but women can't? What?)

Catwoman's appearance in the original comics wasn't exactly meaty, but it was more than the cameo it turned into in the animated feature, and it showed her personality, strength, spunk and protectiveness of Holly. Between all the altered dialogue and Eliza Dushku's performance (she sounded so very, very bored with her lines) it didn't make for the most satisfying watching experience from a Catwoman fan's perspective.

I am disappoint.

Still, it's the second best DC Animated feature that's been put out, right behind the outstanding Justice League: The New Frontier and if you love Jim Gordon as much as I do, you're definitely going to want to see it, but if you were hoping that Catwoman was going to get her fifteen minutes in the spotlight, or that her scenes in the original Year One were going to be done justice, you are sadly mistaken :/

More thoughts on this to follow, once I get them all into a coherent order.

Well drop me from a building and call me Lois Lane, I've got a super hot scoop to share.

News about the Catwoman short is certainly going at a fevered pace today. If the old fiance about_faces weren't glued to the internet a few minutes ago, I might easily have missed the following.

Comics Alliance posted a clip, via MTV's official website, of the pole dancing scene, less than a day ago.

If you click Comics Alliance's link to watch the video, you'll discover that it's already gone from the face of the internet.

Copyright holders pulling sneak-peeks of things that are due out soon is fairly common practice...if the video in question is uploaded by an unofficial entity, like just some random person on YouTube, but it's certainly interesting that a video posted by a major cable network like MTV got pulled, no?

Will the video come back? Is this just a fluke? A problem with the servers? Is DC trying to protect its copyright, or circling the wagons out of fear that the response will be as overwhelmingly negative to this video as it was to Catwoman #1?

For now, there's no way to tell. When there are further developments, one way or another, I'll keep you posted.

ETA: And within twenty minutes of the video being seemingly gone, it's back. Will the embed code work for me, where it didn't work for Comics Alliance?

Get More: MTV Shows



Not working for you? Watch it here on MTV's official site.

I'm not sure how I feel about this. I'm very, very glad that DC decided to release a clip that puts the emphasis on Selina's whip skills rather than on her exposed chest, but if I'd had my way about it, she wouldn't have needed to retrieve the whip from within her costume, as she usually wears it on the outside. As I recall, in an interview with Wizard Magazine during his time working on Hush, Jim Lee actually went on record as saying that the found the use of the whip as a belt to be an incredibly practical choice for the character--although depending entirely on how you feel about Jim Lee's costume design skills, make of that what you will.

What it all comes down to for me are the following factors:

1.) Why is it necessary to have Catwoman's costume unzipped that far when the whip-as-belt and a small flash of skin--perhaps as far as the bottom half of the sternum--would have been far less problematic?

2.) Why did the script play to an entirely predictable cliche, which surrealname called the second he saw it?

3.) Why is this clip being billed as a sneak preview of Batman: Year One when it's a preview from an original Catwoman short? Being as big a name as she is, why is her own short merely an afterthought to Batman's film, when the script could have easily read "A clip from DC Showcase: Catwoman on the Batman: Year One DVD?"

As you can see, there are some interesting choices here...and while they're not nearly as bothersome as those made in Catwoman #1, they're definitely questionable.

Thoughts?

If you're at work, don't even scroll down. The preview image isn't even work safe!

So, on the Batman: Year One DVD that hits stores next Tuesday, a Catwoman short in the tradition of the other DC Showcase shorts that accompanied some of the new DC animated films (like Green Arrow/Black Canary, Jonah Hex and The Spectre), written by Paul Dini will be included.

According to Dini's own LJ: No, I didn't work on the ultra-cool animated adaptation of the classic Batman story, though I DID script a fifteen minute bonus CATWOMAN short included in the package. I just saw the finished piece for the first time last night. It's quite amazing.

News has been spreading across the internet of that short's contents. Thus far, all we know is that Catwoman poses as a dancer at a gentlemen's club during a diamond heist, and does a strip tease during the course of the adventure.

There's certainly nothing wrong with being an exotic dancer (hi, I learned how to breathe fire from one--AND BY THE WAY, never teach a thirteen year old girl to breathe fire) and certainly nothing wrong with Catwoman being one, but in light of Catwoman's highly sexualized and objectified turn in Winick and March's Catwoman #1, it's a little troubling that in the very next high profile thing she's in after that hit shelves, she's losing her clothes again. If the scene serves a purpose and it's not meant solely for the titillation of the heterosexual male audience, thus turning Selina into an object for the second time this month, great! I'll love it! If not...

Photobucket


....oh dear.

Follow the bewbs for the strip tease...Collapse )

Well...I have my suspicions that she's using this as a means of escape/distraction, and the use of the whip during her act would leave everyone off guard for when she actually unleashes hell. The animation also looks like it's going to be really pretty when it's not in choppy gif form.

However, I may be in the minority when I say this, but as a longstanding fan of both characters, at no time should Catwoman have gotten her wardrobe tips from Vampirella. Because I love you and all, Vampi, but...no.



We'll see how this turns out.

In the meantime, I'm going to watch the official advance digital copy of Batman: Year One I've got, and be back later tonight with a review of how that turns out.

Please don't screw up one of the best Batman stories ever, please don't screw up one of the best Batman stories ever, please, please, pleeeeease.





A NOTE TO COMMENTERS: Please do not use slut shaming, whorephobic or misogynistic language when discussing these images. Examples would be words such as "whore", "slut", "tramp", "bitch" or anything similar. Do it and see how fast your ass gets two strikes. This is a safe space for everyone, treat it like one. If you wouldn't say it to a sweet little old lady's face after she gives you cookies and milk, don't even bring it here.

Despite the fact that I'm pretty much knocking on death's door with a pretty high fever and the nastiest flu I've had in years, once again, I find myself with something too good not to post. SO I WILL FIGHT THROUGH THE SICKNESS, YES.

So, today I received an invitation to a fiction reading in New York City that will be broadcast on live radio, WFMU's Thunk Tank Trick-or-Treat Meet-Up.

Why should we all care? Well, Bronwyn Carlton, the writer of issues 78-91 of the 90's Catwoman series is the one sent the invite. She and several other writers will be reading original spoooky stories for the broadcast.

(I knew being facebook friends would pay off sometime!)

In case you didn't know, Carlton's Catwoman run is really controversial in fandom, to the point that there are honestly people who accuse her of being nothing but a pen name for Ed Brubaker, rather than a real, live woman. (Which is...kind of not cool, actually.)

I've been dying to get the opportunity to speak with her about her work on Catwoman ever since I started this blog, but I haven't had the opportunity to really approach her about it, due to a combination of laziness and...laziness, really.

Though that opportunity might not present itself at the reading and with a three month old baby, taking a little jaunt to NYC for the weeked might be hard to manage, it's still something I'm seriously considering.

Not only will it give me the chance to go back to one of my favorite cities, visit actor friends from the Fringe Festival Circuit and eat amazing New York noms, but I can finally help put those rumors of Carlton-is-Brubaker to rest, and maybe gain some insight into her run on Catwoman.

We'll see how this turns out.

In the meantime, I'm going to go back to bed and try not to croak.

So remember when I was going to do a daily scans-a-palooza throughout October? I liked that plan. That was a good plan. *sigh* Oh, life, always getting in the way of what's truly important: fandom. Ah well, I'll get back to that mission tomorrow.

So anyway! Though I've already talked about Catwoman #1 (2011) twice now, and I do have further in-depth thoughts on the book that I haven't yet addressed, part of me really doesn't want to keep beating that dead horse. The majority of my brain is pretty much over it, but if I'm being honest with myself, there are still parts of me that aren't yet satisfied with the critique.

(Because if you make it your mission to evaluate things critically for better or worse and haven't taken something genuinely awful out to the woodshed, beaten it, flayed it and then ground its bones to dust, you're just not doing your job, damn it.)

The rest of the internet seems to be in about the same place I currently am. The majority has put it aside and moved on to new anger-inducing things (like the problematic imagery and objectification of Voodoo #1), but the kerfuffle is far from over.

You all remember the cover to the first printing of Catwoman #1, yes?





I think the best possible criticism of the cover, aside from the Batman mock-up above, is the following from Bleeding Cool:

"We've known for a while that the cover to the Catwoman reboot has the character lying on her back barefoot with her legs in the air, baring her cleavage and pouring sparkling white droplets over her boobs. It’s very tasteful. It sets the tone. She’s a thief, you see, and that’s what thieves do; at the end of a long day of thieving they lie on a rooftop and throw diamonds away. Erotically."

The whole illuminating article can be found right over here. I highly, highly recommend it.

Tomorrow, we return to our regularly scheduled scans-a-palooza, with the purple suit era Catwoman #6 & #7! Stay tuned.

Catwoman #5: The Story That Makes No Sense

Following on the heels of Catwoman #1-4 is Catwoman #5, the first issue that brings Azrael into Catwoman's book, albeit briefly. We'll be getting more into him with the next post, but for now all you really need to know is that he's temporarily filling Batman's shoes.

So, Catwoman #5 opens with Azrael watching over Gotham, which doesn't really have anything to do with anything, and then, after a few pages, kicks over to Catwoman in disguise at the newly opened Skid Row Buds and Flowers. (Cute, Jim Balent, very cute.)

Roller skaters, Ninja Nuns and fighting florists behind the cut...Collapse )

Next time, Catwoman meets Azrael for the first time and is seriously not impressed. Same Cat Time, Same Cat Station!

Catwoman #1-4: Viva Le Purple Suit Era!

Today, I finally, finally start tackling Catwoman's first solo series, from 1993.

(If you haven't yet read The COMPLETE Definitive Catwoman Origin, now would be the time...)

This kicks off 31 Day Scans-a-Palooza, in which I rather suicidally try to post something scans-y once a day, every day, until Halloween. CAN YOU DO IT, DODGERS?


In 1993, with Batman Returns bringing Catwoman back into the limelight in a very big way and making her more popular than ever before, the nineties 'Bad Girl Comic' trend in full swing and the speculator comics bubble still intact, it was inevitable that Selina would wind up with her own solo series. Commonly known as the "Jim Balent Era" or, more often, the "Purple Suit Era," Catwoman's first ongoing series lasted from 1993 to 2001, and stretched some ninety-four issues, plus annuals.

Before the Purple Suit Era began, Catwoman's appearances through Batman's history were fairly sparse. Despite her iconic status, there were entire decades where she made just a handful of appearances. After Crisis on Infinite Earths occurred, giving her a revamped history and look (the gray suit), she popped up a grand total of thirty-six times before the series launched in 1993--an average of five times a year--and many of those appearances were cameos.

With the success of Batman Returns--and, to a lesser extent, Batman: The Animated Series--people were clamoring for a Catwoman solo book, and with the huge Batman event Knightfall going on, spanning several Bat-Family titles, it was incredibly smart of DC to start yet another that could serve as a tie-in to the main Batman books.

(Which is why the first few dozen issues are rife with crossover activity: Catwoman's book was treated less as an actual title in its own right and more as a suppliment to whatever was going on in the DC Universe at large at any given time. This is probably one of the reasons why it's never been collected, and should give you some idea of just how much DC actually valued her before Brubaker's run came along: which is to say not a whole hell of a lot...)

The Catwoman we know from the Purple Suit era first appears in Batman #498, when she's approached by the criminal Bane who, after sending every available villan after Batman and finally breaking Gotham's protector with his own two hands, pretty much runs Gotham through a vast criminal network in Batman's absense. Bane 'offers' Catwoman the job of stealing for him, and with no recourse, she 'accepts', thus becoming a thief-for-hire under duress. And that's where the first story arc of Catwoman picks up, with a museum heist gone awry:

The Abridged Catwoman #1-4: SO MANY SCANS BEHIND THE CUT OMIGOSH.Collapse )

Thooooughts?

:P



No, you don't get context.

So, you want to read Catwoman's solo adventures from the nineties, huh? Think it'll be easy? Think all you have to do is buy every issue in numeric order and that'll be that?

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, wait, wait, I need a minute here. Eh heh, ah ha, ahem. *cough, cough*

I thought that too, once. I was really, really wrong.

With both my very own Catwoman: Year One Timeline and its follow-up Catwoman Year Two out of the way, I can finally start scanning and reviewing all of Catwoman Vol. 2--better known as the Jim Balent Purple Suit Era--which follows the events of those stories perfectly.

There's just one problem: in case you were unaware, comic books from the nineties are a bit of a total custerfluck. I said as much in my review of Catwoman: Year Two, but you really have no idea HOW bad it is. You need a friggin' roadmap to read comics in the nineties, and Catwoman's first ongoing solo title is certainly no exception. It's an intimidating prospect, especially if you're a bit of a newbie or just a casual collector/fan and not...you know...me of the encyclopedic knowledge oh god why didn't I use some of those dendrites for getting better at math.

With this in mind, I've put together a handy guide/checklist, separating each storyarc within the series, and pointing out all the crossover tie-ins that you'd need to pick up to get the whole story. As I scan and review these storyarcs, I'll use this post as a master links list, so that if you're looking for something in particular, you'll be able to refer back to it. I've even included covers, because picture just make everything nicer and will probably whet your appetites better. I personally own all of these issues, so don't worry: there won't be any gaps in my reviews. You'll be getting the entire solo series from start to finish.

Please note: Several annuals have been left out of this listing, since none of them actually fit within the book's own continuity. They WILL be posted, but since two of them are Elseworlds and the other two are pretty nebulous continuity, it seems kind of silly to try and make them fit within the larger context of the series.

Ready? Hooray! Let's get started.


Catwoman #1-4

Tag Lines
#1: When she's bad, she's very very bad...
#2: She'll make them with they were never born...
#3: Some people are dumb enough to get in her way...
#4: They'll never take her alive...


CHAPTER TITLES
#1: Life Lines: Rough Diamonds
#2: Line Lines: Blast from the Past
#3: Life Lines: Shadow of the Cat
#4: Life Lines: Full Circle



A look ahead at what's on the way in the next few weeks, arc by arc!Collapse )

And there you have it. If there are any issues you guys are especially looking forward to, or are really curious about, please don't hesitate to tell me in the comments! I plan on reviewing everything in order, but who knows? If you're looking forward to something specific, it might motivate me to review faster than I would otherwise! :D

Of course, I still have to finish the listings for all the mini-series and guest appearances and cameos and Elseworlds and Animated appearances and her other solo title and...why did I start this blog again? NEVER SLEEP AGAIN. Thank God I started my own database to keep everything neat or they might just find my rotting corpse under an avalanche of comic books. Sheesh.



Copycats is a series of posts, much like my Think Like Selina posts, I've been planning since starting this blog. They're intended to spotlight characters who, in one way or another, are similar to Catwoman. Whether cat themed or cat burglars, comic book characters with a resemblance to Selina are given a brief, shining fifteen minutes of fame in these posts. Because hey, a girl can't be all-Catwoman all the time, now can she?

So, a little over twenty-four hours ago, I inadvertantly kicked off 'Magpie Appreciation Day' via my Tumblr. Er...whoops.



Magpie is one of my favorite lesser known DC characters, and I've been meaning to talk about her here for awhile. She's a thief, much like Selina, who just never seemed to catch on, poor thing. In fact, she's had like, three speaking appearances since her creation in 1986, and then she was killed in Batman: Face the Face in 2006.

As I've said before, I have a soft spot for unloved, neglected characters and, given her history, you can't deny Magpie is that. It's just a bonus that she's a super cool character nobody knows about or uses. She's also a theme villain and a thief, which makes her perfect for the first installment of Copycats. Originally, I intended to just cover cat-themed characters introduced after Catwoman was, but Magpie deserves, nay, commands a post of her very, very own.

First Appearance? Man of Steel #3

What's Her Deal? Margaret Pye, A.K.A. Magpie, is a museum curator by day and a thief by night. Spending all day, every day, among beautiful things she can't own, drives her to supervillainy. She employs henchmen, is not above murder, keeps an aviary (Batman: Face the Face) and is apparently clinically insane (Arkham Asylum: Living Hell).

What's Her M.O.? Magpie favors gems and other loot related to birds. Rather than just stealing them outright, she replaces them with specially made replicas...OF DOOM.

How is she similar to Catwoman? An animal themed jewel thief who keeps birds, steals themed items and is a skilled cat burglar.

How is she different? She's insane, she works with henchmen and she kills people. A lot.

Why Should I Care About Her? I personally got interested in Magpie because of her horrendous fashion sense, but what made me really, really love her was reading the writer's notes in the back of Batman #401:



I adore the writer's enthusiasm, and I love the character all the more for it, especially considering just how Magpie's career in comics turned out. Magpie deserves someone to love her, just because nobody ever has.

Several scans behind the cut...Collapse )

Thoughts? Verdict? Recommendations for the next Copycats post? Leave them in comments!

Cheesecake (noun): Also called Leg Art. Photographs featuring scantily clad attractive women.

T&A (abbreviation): Tits and Ass.


I know some people are having a hard time wrapping their heads around why we in the comics blogosphere are blowing our stacks over Catwoman #1, especially people in the comments of places like Comics Alliance and Newsarama. I mean, after all, comics are a medium in which women are portrayed as hyper-sexualized all the time, and thus, we should expect it to come with the territory.

Never mind that nobody can actually give me a good reason for why that is the way it is, other than “That’s how it’s always been.” which, frankly, isn’t a reason to do anything.

“I keep stubbing my toe on that coffee table!”

“Well, why don’t you move it?”

“But it‘s always been there!”

Highly illogical.

One of the biggest defenses rising from that mentality is that Catwoman qualifies as a Cheesecake Art Book and not an Objectfying Claptrap Book.

I am here to shut those people up. So sit your ass down, you’re about to get schooled.

Webcomic courtesy of Ty Templeton, six pages from Catwoman #1 (2002) and some mildly NSFW cheesecake art behind the cut.Collapse )

How people are still defending this issue is completely beyond me. It’s not just offensive, it’s objectively bad because it’s poorly written. LE SIGH.

And the worst of it is, in all fairness to Winick, I actually really like some of his work (some of his Batman run, specifically, and a bit of his Green Arrow) and by all accounts, his Batwing does right everything Catwoman does wrong. What is it about this title that made him totally jump the rails?
















*A note to commeters: Though I'm posting this webcomic, I don't condone use of words like 'hooker' or even 'prostitute'; sex worker is the only term really welcome here in regards to the profession in question, so I ask you to please respect this when commenting. Sex workers read comics blogs, too, you know. :)

Profile

dr_von_fangirl
dr_von_fangirl

Latest Month

August 2014
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Terri McAllister